Advocates including President Barack Obama believe every child deserves the opportunity to begin school early with universal Pre-K. Opponents say it's a waste of taxpayer's dollars in these tough economic times. Where do you stand on this educational issue?
The key word to universal pre k is providing QUALITY education. It is essential that the academic program in preschool is based on providing children with experiences that are meaningful to the child. Universal pre k can be successful if it includes a safe loving environment where the children can explore the world learn letter and number recognition as well as improve their fine motor gross motor and social skills.
In fact each parent at home is able to help their child excel and develop a love for learning.
Here is a great site: http://www.preschools4all.com
Good luck to all the parents out there
Mom
As someone who will be sending my children to private school, why should I be paying for the rest of the world to send their children to pre-k when they don't even have to go. Basically, I will be paying for someone elses babysitter?
2 of my children went to pre-k and 2 did not. The ones that did not go were not behind in their development, nor were the ones who did go that far ahead in their development either. I pesronally haven't seen a huge benefit to pre-k.
Terrible idea, we need to let our children be children. They'll be students from K-12 and perhaps beyond. Instituting "universal" pre-K means reducing choices for families because privately run day-care and pre-K will be put out of business. Then we'll be left with the same inefficient monopoly government has on the rest of the education system.
I never went to pre-K and I turned out fine... I always assumed that pre-K was an optional extra year of schooling, useful for working parents (like mine) who didn't have the time to spend with their kids to teach them their alphabet and colors. btw, I did not mean for that to seem judgmental or rude and I'm sorry if it came off that way...
With that said, why are we essentially trying to add another grade to the public education system? Honestly, if we're going to improve education, we need to start with the grades we already have. I still don't know my times tables off the top of my head because I was never made to learn them. I still can't remember what I even learned in fourth grade because my teacher was a storyteller, not a teacher. Education is the hardest place to reform because it requires manpower that just isn't there. It takes guts to become and stay a teacher.
Universal pre-K? No thanks. I'm already a slave to the US public education system with the 12 years I've had.
I also don't see why we would ever believe that the government can do this better than what's already offered. If this does happen, the fairest option would be a vouchers.
probably a good idea to offer it, but it shouldn't be mandatory. my girls wanted to go and enjoyed it. but i have a friend who didn't send any of her 3 kids and they all did fine. they didn't want to go and she was able to provide a learning environment at home. but lets face it, not every home is an ideal pre-k set up.
I picked 'other' as my choice because I don't believe in UPK at all, no matter the circumstance. I rather like the idea of a competitive market vying for my child's attendance. Take that away and you'll just have the cruddy public education system we currently have. Plus, I also don't believe that preschool is really necessary for most; It's a fun, social thing for kids to do. Some may learn their ABC's and how to count to 10 or more by the time they are kindergarten, but some won't and in the end everything evens out as they get older. Why not let kids enjoy themselves at 3, 4 and 5 years old instead of hoping to make them Einsteins.
first it doesn't save daycare because it is only 2 to 3 days a week 3 hours a day. If you work you still have to find childcare AND transportation.
SOrry I am not one for it and I am a preschool teacher.
How about smaller class sizes? This is my sons first year having the bigger class sizes and I can see the toll it is taking on his teacher. Having 34 kids in a class just makes them harder to control. He's doing fine as he is very smart but I would imagine if he wasn't it would make a difference in the quality of education.
The government doesn't pay... taxpayers do. I don't have enough faith in the public school system to mandate that kids be subject to another year. More time in school doesn't automatically equal a smarter kid. More time spent by the parents to ensure their kid is learning something would, though. I think asking parents to make the investment in their kids should come before asking the general population to invest in someone else's kids.
Parent's should be able to decide if they want to send their children to pre-K. Personally I think children will have to go to school for so many years, let their first years be school free.
Once the government start paying the chance is that is becomes compulsory.
If you're going to invest in education for the future, this is the place to do it. You get more return on investment through Pre-K than any other educational spending.
18 Comments