Quantcast
 

Walt Disney Banning Children?

Mon, 01/07/2008 - 9:00am by babysugar
1,140 Views - 18 comments

Children dream of going to the wonderful world of Disney to meet their heroes, wear mouse ears, ride the Dumbo ride, and eat cotton candy. And, most parents love taking their kids to Disney to fulfill those childhood fantasies while relaxing a little bit themselves. Apparently, some adults, in the midst of all things Disney, will be able to relax kid free according to a Tampa Bay news report.

Victoria and Albert's, an upscale restaurant at Walt Disney World, has closed its doors to children eleven and under. At first, I flinched thinking, isn't Disney World a place where two large rodents by the names Minnie and Mickey Mouse roam free? And Bambi and Donald the Duck are revered and not hunted? But after reading up on the swank eatery, I realized that maybe this was the right call. To see why I think the restaurant made a good decision, read more.

As I learned from Frommer's, Victoria and Albert's is a "jackets required" romantic hot spot with limited seating – only room for 65 people to dine at a time. While a harpist serenades patrons, they can browse the menu, set at $95 prix fixe minimum. The fare, which is offered across seven courses, includes duck, pheasant, abalone, veal, or tuna. At the end of the meal, the diners are presented with a personalized menu and a rose.

Call me crazy but this doesn't sound like the kind of place that has chicken tenders or French fries for emergency tantrum solutions. But just in general, it seems like an oasis for adults and older children, those who can appreciate silverware and the lack of sippy cups, to enjoy a nice night without a pair of oversized round ears poking out from every table.


18 Comments Add a Comment

  • Greggie's picture
    Greggie
    1

    I'm ok with the idea. My only thought is "What would I do with my kids?" because I'm not at all comfortable using hotel/resort provided childcare. So we'd be unlikely to dine there, but I think it's a good idea for those parents who do want a meal alone.

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • isahrangme's picture
    isahrangme
    2

    I think it's a great idea! Even better that it's just one restaurant, and not the whole park, as I thought when I misread the post title.

    Plenty of couples go to Disneyland (I'm in SoCal) for dates, so I'm sure plenty go to Disney World. So yea, I'm loving the idea of personalized menus and roses and romance and sigh~

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • jennifer76's picture
    jennifer76
    3

    I think that's a lovely idea. And lots of people travel with family - kids can go to kid restaurants with grandparents and aunts & uncles while mom & dad get one nice date night out of the trip. Perfect!

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • Greggie's picture
    Greggie
    4

    "kids can go to kid restaurants with grandparents and aunts & uncles while mom & dad get one nice date night out of the trip."

    Exactly. We don't, which is why I probably wouldn't use it. But others would, as well as being comfortable with the hotel/resort childcare. I think it's great to have that getaway for those who want it.

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • schnappycat's picture
    schnappycat
    5

    Considering my husband and I went to Disney World on our honeymoon (don't ask--we were young, wanted something easy, and it was paid for by my inlaws), this would have been perfect for us.

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • kia's picture
    kia
    6

    A lot of folks go to Disney World for honeymoons and other romantic get-aways without little ones in tow. This kind of venture makes perfect sense especially since Disneyland has Club 33 which is a lot more exclusive than what Victoria and Albert's sounds like.

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • Jennifer777's picture
    Jennifer777
    8

    Totally agree with this! Seriously, I think only 3 families go there with their children each month...

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • ellipsery's picture
    ellipsery
    9

    That's a great idea! I love Disney, and I can understand kids running around, being loud and etc. in the park (I think it should be encouraged, as long as they're not crashing into people and the like); however, I'd still like the option of dining in peace -- an atmosphere where I can have a nice, adult conversation. I generally have always had poor experiences at "nicer" restaurants with small children who don't know how to behave in that sort of setting yet.

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • UrbanBohemian's picture
    UrbanBohemian
    10

    That's really acceptable. I remember going to Disney World and Disneyland as a kid and my sister and I had babysitters while my parents went out for a couple of nights during our vacation. With all the childcare options at Disney parks, It's nice that they can be just as accommodating for parents themselves.

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • sassy_chick's picture
    sassy_chick
    11

    I totally agree-- it's only one restaurant, and it isn't as if they are banning children completely from the resort. There are plenty of kid-friendly options, so I think they made a great decision!

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • sundrops's picture
    sundrops
    12

    Seems like it would be more Disney-oriented if they offered a childcare place complete with Disney playground nearby. Of course if one could afford $95 on one meal they probably already have a nanny or babysitter traveling with them!

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • macgirl's picture
    macgirl
    13

    kia- club 33 isn't really that fancy. The thing that makes it so exclusive is you have to know someone who is a member to get in. Then again I've only been to club 33 for lunch a few times- it might be up a notch at dinner time.

    That restaurant sounds fantastic and I'm way OK with there being a no kids under 11 rule.

    47 weeks 3 days ago Report Comment
  • erinjg's picture
    erinjg
    14

    I am a mother and I think this is a wonderful idea! It gives those travelers who are not toting children around a little oasis from the Disney chaos. It also saves us parents from worrying about bothering people who are sensitive to temper tantrums. Eye-wink

    47 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • ElectroPopTart's picture
    ElectroPopTart
    15

    I go to Disneyland EVERY friday evening!!!! WOOT! =D Kids sometimes DO get in the way, ironically.

    47 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • PrplPeach78's picture
    PrplPeach78
    16

    I have been to Victoria and Albert's a very lucky 3 times. I can tell you that it is definitely not a place for younger children. It is a dressy, elegant, and very intimate place to eat. The food is beyond amazing! Most children can be picky eaters and for the price it would not be reasonable to take young children who would probably not eat what they have to offer. It is a great experience and one everyone should do at least once!

    47 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • Cali2747's picture
    Cali2747
    17

    My parents are Disney nuts, but now that we kids are grown-up sometimes Disney isn't their #1 choice. However, Disney boasts that they are the place for children of all ages, so I hope they continue thinking about adults who love Disney, but who don't like sippy cups, tired (cranky)kids, and sticky fingers while dining on a $95 dinner.Their cruise line has adult only resturants AND pools.

    47 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • i am awesomeness's picture
    i am awesomeness
    18

    I see nothing wrong with this. At the prices they demand, how many parents would bring their picky little eaters in anyway?? There should be a place for adults who want to decompress and enjoy fine dining in an atmosphere free from screaming children and possible temper tantrums/food fights.

    47 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment

Leave a Comment

To post comments, please sign in or register.



Morsels of goodness, delivered daily.

Enter your email below:
 
 
 
 
 
 
View All Kids | Add Your Kid's Profile
 
 
 
 
 
 











©1976-2008 Sugar Inc. | Privacy (updated July-4-2008) | Terms of Use | Copyright Policy | Advertise | Contact Us