If you could buy one more piece of the puzzle, would you? Some parents rely on their pediatricians for recommended tests and screenings, while others are willing to take matters into their own hands. When it comes to autism, many mamas seek out doctors willing to use a modified vaccination schedule or conform to a controlled diet in order to reduce the chances of their lil one developing the disorder. While researchers work on the possibility of a prenatal screening, one company is touting its ability to screen 24- to 48-month-olds for the likelihood that they will develop the disorder.
The same company that developed a system for testing a child's language development through the mail has introduced the LENA Language and Autism Screen ($200). By placing a recording device in specially designed clothing and letting it record 12 to 16 hours of a child's speech, LENA claims they can process the data and provide parents with a probability of their youngster being diagnosed with autism.
Given the importance of early detection, would you invest in an autism screening assessment?
Tod's
Tomas Maier
Cath Kidston
I'm all for early detection, but it seems like the company is preying on fears of parents to make a quick buck.
1Not without other symptoms indicating a need, and in that case they can often diagnose autism without that $200 bill anyway. I'd be far more likely to invest that $200 in regular offices visits to monitor my child and watch for symptoms.
2Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.