It's vain, but c-section babies usually have nice, round heads rather than the chance of a cone shaped one that can come with a tight squeeze down the birth canal.
NO, this is NOT TRUE. I had two children, one by c/s and one by vaginal birth and they were BOTH beautiful and the VBAC baby was FAR healthier than the cesarean baby. This whole article is
filled with outright lies and misinformation.
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and
prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are made, please login or register. Or connect with your Facebook account: .
Vivienne Westwood
Vila
Nﾟmph
Like this? Be the first! Please login or register to like this
4 Comments Post a Comment
is this true??!
1NO, this is NOT TRUE. I had two children, one by c/s and one by vaginal birth and they were BOTH beautiful and the VBAC baby was FAR healthier than the cesarean baby. This whole article is filled with outright lies and misinformation.
2Load of crap again. This is pretty much proof that you can put anything on the 'net. 3 vaginal babies, none had cone shaped heads.
3My vbac baby did not have a cone shaped head. Even if she did it would be temporary. C-section scars are not temporary!
4Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.