The Boy Scouts of America has been credited with building boys up, but do they also tear young men down with their discriminatory policies? First there was the issue with gay youth and now it's overweight children and volunteers. New weight restrictions may keep some scouts and their parents from participating in activities. One report said:
A new mandatory weight requirement by the national Boy Scouts of America that will take effect next January has some longtime volunteers concerned they will be left out of trips they've enjoyed with their sons for years.
This means one father who currently weights in at 370 pounds and has long been involved in the organization would have to drop to a minimum of 239 pounds to be allowed to "participate in any high-adventure activity and events in which emergency evacuation would take longer than 30 minutes by ground transportation."



Active Wear
Azzedine Alaia
Milly
isn't the whole purpose of private clubs to include just a certain sub group? if people don't like it they can start their own group.
1I refuse to support the boy scouts in any way, shape, or form. They can be as bigoted and exclusionary as they wish to, and I'll continue to exercise my reciprocal right of freedom of association to refuse to have any part in their group. We don't even purchase from their fundraisers. And when my kids or their friends ask why, we explain our feelings about their bigotry. Although there could be an argument made for safety issues here, it certainly doesn't excuse the other discriminatory practices their organization promotes.
2The Girl Scouts are actively recruiting girls from different backgrounds (I saw one volunteer at school trying to recruit Hispanic females, which they believe are under-represented in their group!), while the Boy Scouts are discriminating against people who don't fit their mold. I have a good friend who became an eagle scout when we were in high school, but now I will actively speak out against the group. Good grief!
3ugh, I don't really like a lot of these groups that have kids go around selling stuff for them. I never buy anything from them. I know it has nothing to do with this particular story but I just wanted to rant.
4while i don't agree w/ their policy on sexual orientation, i completely see their point on this concerning volunteers. someone who is 370 pounds would pose a considerable risk in many outdoor/adventure situations. i can think of countless ones off the top of my head.
and i think childhood obesity is a significant problem. encouraging young boys to keep active and fit is what they need. the problem, i can see though, will be that these guidelines may discourage them from joining,not to mention, what it would do to a child's self-esteem if he were to be kicked out or whatever b/c he is too large.
5Let's see, people who are morbidly obese will not be allowed to take part in activities that are high activity in areas that emergency services cannot access quickly and people are complaining about it? Gimme a break! They can't win with this. If they allowed it and something happened to a child or parent they would be sued. Any honest person can admit that.
The Boy Scouts at any rate are all about mental and physical fitness and why shouldn't they have standards that have to be met?
Since when is having standards bigotry? If my son was in Scouts and I found out that the scoutmaster was gay, I would not feel comfortable with my child being in that troop. Most parents would feel the same. Most are afraid to say so publicly however.
6seriously buttercuppy? do you think gay men are pedophiles? would you be uncomfortable with your son sleeping over at a friend's house where his friend's 'straight' mother would be?
standards about weight = safety.
7standards about sexual orientation=bigotry
How does someone even reach a weight of 360? I think there is nothing wrong with this.
8I think a weight limit is arbitrary. Shaquille O'Neal is 325 pounds and 7' 1" (according to nba.com). I consider him to be physically fit. However, he exceeds the boy scouts limits according to the chart above. Would they exclude him? If it required some sort of physical fitness requirement or clearance from a doctor, then I wouldn't be as offended.
Buttercuppy - I'm fairly certain you don't speak for most parents.
9buttercuppy...why wouldnt you want your son to be with a gay scout leader? there's absolutely no reason to discriminate on sexual orientation like that....and i agree with HACB, you really don't represent most parents on this one
10Buttercuppy, you made me sigh out loud at my desk. I'm embarassed on your behalf.
11I don't think anyone should be embarassed on Buttercuppy's behalf. Everyone has their own opinion. I should just say that saying "Most parents would feel the same" is unfair since you do not know how other parents think. I find that people are very honest on lilsugar and if someone feels the same way you do, they will say so on their own.
I am personally not sure how I would feel if my son's Boy Scout leader was gay since I have never been in the situation. I don't think that having a gay leader would make my son gay and I don't think the intention of the leader would be to make anyone gay, so why not...but again, I am not sure I would feel the same if I were actually in this situation.
In regards to being overweight, I do feel that they are doing the right thing by putting a weight limit for certain outdoor adventures. They are not saying you have to be skinny, but you just have to be under a certain weight which is not so low. Let's be honest, 250 pounds is still overweight, but it is safer than being 300 pounds. After watching the Biggest Loser for so many seasons, no one wants to be 300 pounds and even though they might complain about these rules, I'm sure they would rather just be healthier in the first place. Maybe this will push more people to actually lose enough weight to be healthy.
12Statistics bear out the reality that a gay man is far less likely to engage in pedophilic acts than a straight man. Considering how frequently coaches, scoutmasters, and religious figures who are supposed "family men" are accused (and often found to be guilty) of inappropriate sexual contact with minors, I'd have to say I feel much safer exposing my minor children to gay men then straight men. So, sorry to say, you surely don't speak for this parent.
As I said before, medical concerns may be different than sexual orientation bigotry, but both of them smack of elitism and exclusionary practices. An obese person can sign waivers acknowledging the increased danger they will be subject to and still be allowed to participate.
13i would not mind my son having a gay caregiver or scout-leader... it does seem that they are a bigoted organization. i think you are homophobic if you feel that way. otherwise you need some basic education on sexuality. aren't most pedophiles disguised as married straight men?
14*i think you are homophobic if you are afraid of a gay man being in a caring/leader position with your son
15Their policies are discriminatory. They should be more then welcoming of people of all sizes. Afterall isn't the best way to lose weight and to promote an active lifestyle is to actually do these things? Unable to take part in events means these people will likely stay home and not get the health benefits they would have received on the trip.
And WTF on the gay thing. You tell me the last time you ever heard of a gay man or woman molesting a child!
16I agree with Danni99. If people over these weights are willing to sign waivers to participate, let them.
My sons were not around a gay scoutmasters, they were around friends and to be truthful I feared less for their safety and well being then than when my youngest started to visit his father overnight.
Most gay men do not whisper in your child's ear that "being gay is the only way you'll be cool" or whatever. They also are less likely to be peodphiles as was already stated. I, as a parent do not take issue with it.
17They are not excluding obese from all activities, but from the high adventure ones. I would have a hard time imagining a parent or child that is very overweight on a 50 mile hike or a rock climbing weekend. I think this really is about safety.
Like mstrauss said- they're not asking participants to be skinny or even healthy, they are covering their own liability.
18I think it's pretty obvious that the Boy Scouts are discriminating based on weight. Whether they have a valid reason for it is an entirely different question.
And Buttercuppy, please don't pretend to speak for me.
19I would feel more comfortable if my child's scout leader was in good physical shape and could be looked up to as a role model/leader for my child...as far as sexual orientation goes, i have a HUGE problem with the boy scouts discriminating against gay leaders. it actually really ticks me off, i am looking forward to the day when conversations about people's sexual orientation will be as passe as conversations about racism.
20I am teaching my children to be open minded so I'd never sign them up for the scouts since I think the organization's rules are discriminatory.
21They specifically mentioned the High Adventures.
Both of my brothers have participated in all 3 High Adventures, and one even worked at Philmont for the summer. Philmont is based around hiking in New Mexico (very hot outside), for example. Someone at 370 lbs. would probably be at greater risk of exhaustion or worse.
I understand their concern, and I fully believe that the Boys Scouts have made a good choice.
22Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.